Diddy’s Lawyers Claim Voyeurism Doesn’t Count as Prostitution

Diddy‘s listening to on his movement to get the Mann Act expenses thrown out began simply a short while in the past … and, his attorneys are taking their argument from authorized motions to actual life — firing off in a New York Metropolis courtroom.

The rapper’s authorized workforce — led by Marc Agnifilo — kicked off their argument by repeating to the decide what they beforehand said in authorized papers … prostitution means one particular person paying to have intercourse with one other particular person. They insist it would not confer with somebody who pays to observe two individuals have intercourse, like Diddy did.

Nonetheless, prosecutors responded by declaring Diddy wasn’t simply going someplace and sitting in a sales space to observe two individuals get it on … they are saying he reimbursed his ex-girlfriends for arranging the sexual encounters and derived sexual gratification himself from watching.

Prosecutors additionally add the fees cannot come all the way down to a free speech concern — in a pornography sense — as a result of not each sexual encounter was filmed.

Diddy’s attorneys fired again by arguing it was filmed more often than not. Additionally they say Diddy was engaged in beginner pornography, which they are saying is not against the law.

Diddy’s workforce attacked the inspiration of the Mann Act too … calling it an previous, racist regulation judges have expressed outrage about over the past 100 years.

As you recognize … Diddy’s attorneys, his household and prosecutors all rolled up to the courtroom shortly earlier than the listening to to search out out if the two Mann Act convictions will likely be tossed or if he’ll get one other trial on them.